Click for Minneapolis, Minnesota Forecast

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

(NOTE: This is a secondary blog site, you will find the main site at: www.targetfiling.blogspot.com here is a sample of what is there.)

Background: This is the 4th year this site has been up and running. The site exists to showcase the Target AP Directives and they are here in full later in the blog.

The original source of these 'Directives' is Mr. Scott Hundt, a former asset protection specialist at a Target store in Wisconsin. He kept a copy of the Directives when he was 'terminated' in June 2006 and subsequently posted them on the internet and forwarded me a copy in July 2006 and I also posted them on my blog.

Shortly after this, it came to the attention of Tarbutt, that their AP Directives were online and they leaned on Hundt who caved in immediately and removed them from the site he had posted them on. My blog has kept them posted since I first received them.

I also placed information of the availability of the Directives on various 'message boards', sometimes with the below summary.


Tarbutt sent threatening letters and emails to these sites demanding the information be deleted. I found that the sites universally caved in to the demands and removed the information and in most cases both deleted my screen name and banned me from their sites. I had at one time a blog titled: TargetSucks and that blog host was also contacted and deleted the blog. see letter at:
http://www.retail-worker.com/documents/20060727.target_cease_and_desist.pdf

This blog site was the subject of 23 months of litigation wherein Tarbutt whinned about it and insisted damages be paid and the information removed, but on July 16, 2008 the case was tossed out by Judge Cooper in Atlanta Federal Court. So for the moment anyway, the 1st Ammendment remains in effect.

I estimate that the total cost to Tarbutt was 250k and to me it was $0. Although I don't like Tarbutt, I would really suggest that they find better legal representation than Faegre & Benson (http://www.faegre.com/) for their outsourced legal work, they really did a crappy job.

Just FYI here is a brief glimpse of what is contained in those 39 or so pages, which you will find in full, later in this blog:

From: Target AP Directives

C. Five Steps for Apprehension


Certified AP team members must observe all five steps prior to making a shoplifter apprehension.

NOTE: If local law enforcement takes independent action and makes an apprehension before all five steps are met, the details must be documented in the CIRS report.

1. Initiation of Observation - The subject must enter the store/area without possession of Target merchandise.

2. Selection - The subject must be observed selecting Target merchandise from the display location.

3. Concealment - The subject must be observed concealing the merchandise, or the AP team member must have NO reasonable doubt based on observations that the merchandise has been concealed by the subject.

NOTE: If the merchandise is not actually concealed, it must be exposed as the subject exits or attempts to exit the store.

4. Maintain Observation - The AP team member must maintain sufficient surveillance of the subject in order to know the location of the merchandise and ensure the subject does not discard the merchandise.

NOTE: A Productive Merchandise Recovery (PMR) shall be attempted if surveillance is broken for any reason, or the AP team member can not maintain sufficient surveillance. (See PMR Directive)

5. Failure to Pay for Merchandise/Exiting the Store -AP team member(s) must observe the subject attempt to exit the store without paying for the merchandise.


NOTE: Some jurisdictions allow variances from the exiting requirement to allow apprehensions of concealed merchandise before an individual reaches the building’s exit. In these cases, the requirements must be documented and approved by the Director or Vice President of Assets Protection using the “Variance from Exiting Form” (found on the AP Zone).

----------------------------------------------

D. Restroom / Fitting Room


Apprehensions AP team members are not allowed to conduct surveillance or make apprehensions in restroom and/or fitting rooms.

1. AP team members are not allowed to follow subject’s into a restroom or fitting room to conduct surveillance.

2. AP team members shall not ask another team member to enter a fitting room or restroom to conduct surveillance.

-------------------------------------------------

B. Searches of Private Residence or Motor Vehicles

1. AP team members will NOT participate in a search of a private residence or motor vehicle.

--------------------------------------------------

1. Fleeing Shoplifter

a. If a shoplifter attempts to flee after being confronted, do not give chase in any manner (running, driving, etc.).

b. Store based AP team members shall not use any vehicle to follow or pursue a subject for any reason.

c. AP team members shall not encourage, condone, suggest or ask another Target team member or anyone else to chase a fleeing shoplifter.

2. AP shall refer for prosecution all individuals apprehended for retail theft when the value of the merchandise is $20.00 or greater and the case meets local prosecution requirements.


NOTE: If a case meets/exceeds the $20.00 referral guideline, but is NOT referred, the reason for non-referral must be included in the CIRS narrative. (Example: Local jurisdiction limits require merchandise in excess of $75.00 in order for prosecution.)


3. A team member witness, of the same gender of the suspected shoplifter , must be present in the room at all times during the detention.

--------------------------------------------

A. Photographing Shoplifters

1. Adult shoplifters - AP shall photograph all adult shoplifters unless prohibited by local statutes or ordinances.

2. Team Member Shoplifters - AP will not photograph any team member apprehended for shoplifting during working or non-working hours.


3. Juvenile Shoplifters - AP will not photograph any juveniles apprehended for shoplifting, unless required by local statutes or ordinances.
===================================

Saturday, August 29, 2009


There is a 'message board' available for Target. Post your comments, opinions or problems at:
========================================

Saturday, August 15, 2009

This is a secondary blog

You will find much more Target info at: www.targetfiling.blogspot.com

This site was set up as a fallback to the original site in case that one had to be closed down.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Assets Protection Mission Statement:
To enhance profitability, the guest experience, and our reputation by minimizing loss and business disruptions and providing secure environments.


-------Store Positions-------

o Target Protection Specialist (TPS, Sr.)-
The TPS position is all about presence. The Law Enforcement-style uniform and Batman belt serve to deter potential shoplifters as well provide peace-of-mind to guests. The Sr. TPS position has the added ability to make apprehensions.

o Assets Protection Specialist (APS, Sr.)-
The APS position is all about External Apprehensions. They wear plain clothes, and are usually exempt from the duties that other AP Team Members may have. The Sr. APS position has the added ability to perform Internal Interviews.

o Assets Protection Team Leader (APTL, APL)-
The APTL is the hourly equivalent of the ETL-AP. APTLs cannot perform Internal Interviews, so the Investigation Center monitors APTL/APL stores closely. A new position, the APL, is exactly the same as the APTL position in all facets, however, they do not have any allotted TPS hours.

o Executive Team Leader – Assets Protection (ETL-AP)-
At one time, the ETL-AP position was the backbone of AP. They could wear plain clothes, and their sole job was to catch Internals and Externals. However, non-HRSP ETL-APs now have to work LOD shifts, during which time they become store-side, and cannot make any AP-related impacts.

o Assets Protection Business Partner (APBP)-
Formerly the District Assets Protection Team Leader (DAPTL). In February 2009, STLs became the immediate supervisors to Assets Protection. The APBP role was modified to reflect that change.

o Group Assets Protection Team Leader (GAPTL)

-------HQ-------

o Regional Director of Assets Protection

o Vice President of Assets Protection - Brad Brekke

-------Investigation Center (IC) Positions-------

o Investigation Specialist (IS)-
The IS position is similar in many respects to the store-side Sr. APS position. An IS wears plain clothes, and is deployed to stores based on current theft trends in the market. The apprehensions an IS makes should restricted to high-dollar cases, and they also have the ability to perform Internal Interviews. They are not necessarily based out of the IC.

o Investigation Tech (IT)-
Based out of the IC, the Techs are responsible for camera work, investigating losses, communicating market trends (Daily Intelligence Briefings), performing Booster Interviews, and other tasks.

o Investigations Center Operations Leader (ICOL)

o Investigator-
The Investigator position is the direct supervisor to the IS. Investigators deploy the IS to necessary locations, as well as partnering with the FBI and other Law Enforcement Agencies to perform stings on suspected Fencing Locations. They also become involved if an ETL is suspected of Internal theft.

o Investigations Team Leader (ITL)

o Investigations Group Assets Protection Team Leader (I-GAPTL)

-------Distribution Center (DC) Positions-------

o Distribution Center Assets Protection Tech (DC-AP Tech)

o Distribution Center Assets Protection Analyst (DC AP Analyst)o Assets Protection Group Leader (APGL)

o Market Assets Protection Group Leader (MAPGL)

o Distribution Center Group Assets Protection Team Leader (DC-GAPTL)

-------Equipment-------

o Segway-
Reserved for high Security Index stores, the Segway is a two-wheeled electric vehicle.
http://www.segway.com/patrol/images/.../security4.jpg

o T3-
Reserved for high Security Index stores, the T3 is the three wheeled successor to the Segway.
http://www.t3motion.com/images/t3_airport2.jpg


-------Technology-------

o Analog, Loronix-
Analog Cameras running into one or more Multiplexes. Video is recorded onto VHS. If the store has Loronix, they have the added ability to connect some cameras into a PC. The Loronix software then makes playback possible, and even ties into Transaction Information.

o Target Digital Video (TDV)o Target Video Solutions (TVS)-
TVS is the current model for all new and remodeled stores. All video is stored on a local server, and all cameras can be accessed by the IC. The Genetec software allows for searches based on transaction information, motion, and time frame.

o Digital Video Storage (DVS)-
A recently rolled out pilot, currently being tested by several districts. DVS allows TVS and Loronix video to be uploaded directly to the IC.

o Common Investigation Management System (CIMS)-
Pronounced “sims”, this is the now defunct software for entering information regarding ongoing cases.

o Common Incident Reporting System (CIRS)-
Pronounced “sears”, this is the now defunct software for entering information about an incident.

o Target Case Management (TCM)-
This is the recently rolled out replacement to CIMS, CIRS, and IC's Sharepoint systems. TCM gives AP teams the ability to store all case information in one centralized location.


-------Common Terms-------

o Intelligence Led-
Intelligence Led is the most important term in the AP dictionary. It has no single definition, but ultimately implies all of the following:

We are pulling QUALITY externals. This means we need to focus on our average recovered amount per case.

We are gathering information from all resources (PITL, Empty Packages, Count Updates, Market / Company Trends, LE Information) and acting on it.
Can you speak to every action you take? Why did you move this camera? Why did you stop this person? etc.

Are you communicating this information to Investigations?
"Collect, Analyze, Action"

o Theft-
Theft is the loss of merchandise or property by either guest (External) or team member (Internal). There are two main types of External Theft. First is opportunistic, where a person takes an item simply because an opportunity was there. They are usually, but not always, amateur shoplifters. The second are boosters, where a person (or persons) takes expensive or high demand products as a source of income.

o Fraud-
Fraud is the use of a counterfeit or stolen form of payment, or a form of payment with insufficient funds. Like Theft, this can be either Internal or External.

o Safe & Secure-
Safe & Secure and Security Incidents are NOT the same as Safety. Security implies an overall feeling of being safe. Are all areas well lit? Do Team Members enter and leave as a group?

o Physical Security-
This term encompasses Key Control, Alarms, and Burglary or Robbery Prevention and Response.

o Security Index-
The Security Index grades a store based on how many Security Incidents occur, the surrounding area, the repetition of incidents, and the type of incidents that occur (severity).

o Merchandise Protection-
This is a blanket term applying to all Merchandise Protection methods, including but not limited to: Spider-Wraps, EAS Tags, Blu-Ray, DVD, and Video Game Keepers, CD Sleeves, and Bottle Security Wraps. The Logistics team is responsible for the application of all security devices.

o Branding-
The term “Branding” refers to the application of small Bullseye stickers to certain products. These stickers are difficult to remove, and help to identify Target Merchandise.

o Shortage Indicator-
The Shortage Indicator is a monthly report that grades the store's shortage potential using the following categories: Receiving (Orders not Rec'd), POS (Unidentified Sales (999)), Instocks (Research), Price Accuracy (Final and Salvage Markdown), Flow (Baffle %), and Reverse Logistics (Vendor Credits, CRC Aging, and CRC Error). While previous versions of the Shortage Indicator graded stores on their position within the company, the current version grades a store on itself, similar to DTK metrics.

o Directives-
The Assets Protection bible. The Directives state, clearly, what an Assets Protection Team Member can and cannot do. Failure to abide by the Directives usually results in a Final Warning.

o Non-Violent Intervention (NVI)-
NVI has two sections: Verbal De-Escalation, and Non-Violent Physical Intervention. All ETLs and GSTLs should take the Verbal De-Escalation course. AP Team Members are the only ones permitted to take the Physical portion.

o Target & Blue-
A program to encourage partnership between Target and Law Enforcement. This includes offering Grants, donating equipment, building sub-stations, and other opportunities for LE.

o National Night Out (NNO)-
Annual family event that takes place in August, to showcase Target's long-standing partnership with Law Enforcement. The events differ from location to location.


-------Reports-------

o Perpetual Inventory Tracking Log (PITL)-
A daily routine that involves physically counting high theft and current trend items. Theses item vary from location to location.

o Count Updates-
Similar to the new Drastic Count Change report, the Count Update report lists the top research items for the selected date range. AP Teams should audit this at least once a week to verify the correct counts were entered, and identify potential trends, or even Internals.

o Empty Package Tracking-
Still not officially released, this report should theoretically list items scanned in the system as being “Empty Packages”.


======================================

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Something else FYI:

When you finish looking at this site you might want to take a look at one called Job Vent. There are reviews of many firms, written by both employees and customers.

The one for Target has 18 reviews, 16 negative and 2 positive. You might want to put in your own opinions at:
http://www.jobvent.com/companyBrowse.php?CompanyID=2081

Friday, April 3, 2009

Rodent Infestation Closes Target Store


Dead Rodents, Chewed Bags Found In Store
April 2, 2009


PIKESVILLE, Md. -- The Target store on Reisterstown Road in Pikesville has been closed until further notice because of a rodent problem. The Maryland Department of Environmental Protection shut down the store because it was infested with mice and other rodents. Baltimore County officials said the store had a problem at its snack bar in February, but it has since spread to the entire store.

Customers told 11 News they tried to shop at the store, but a manager was there all day Thursday to turn them away with no clear reason as to why the store was closed.

Customers were turned away from the Target in Pikesville due to a rodent problem. Some said they were told the store was doing maintenance. One woman told 11 News the store told her it was a water main problem. "This is really very strange," said customer Judy Schwartz.

Jonas Jacobson, of the Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management, said his office got an anonymous complaint at the end of March.

"We went out and found a much larger mouse infestation problem through the store," he said. Jacobson said rodent carcasses and feces were strewn throughout the store. He said pet food bags and human food containers were also chewed open.

Store managers wouldn't answer 11 News' questions Thursday, but the store's corporate office confirmed the problem. "We are working to clean up the store to prevent future problems and will work with Baltimore County to remedy the situation." - Target Corp.

"We acknowledge this is unacceptable. We are working to clean up the store to prevent future problems and will work with Baltimore County to remedy the situation," the corporation said in a statement.

The county said Target has taken many steps to rid the store of the problem, including setting traps, using pesticides and doing a wall-to-wall cleaning of the store.

"They're going to be submitting an integrated pest management plan, so they're taking action to eliminate the problem, and as soon as we're satisfied the problem has been dealt with, they will be allowed to reopen," Jacobson said.

Store officials said they're hoping to reopen late Friday, but county officials said it may take until next week to clean up the problem.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Target Corp loses a long running case in Oklahoma!

Target Corp loses a long running case in Oklahoma!
Therrien v. Target Corporation

On Feb 19th the case that has bounced around since approx 3/06 was resolved with a verdict against the Target Corporation for $500,000 (+15K in costs).

You might recall that last year it was dismissed after Target put on its case and before Therrien’s case could be presented. The matter was appealed on the basis that the Federal Judge James Payne had not considered the new changes to Oklahoma statutes and had thur ruled incorrectly. So the case was retired with the result that Target lost. (of course they also can appeal)

Briefly: "Plaintiff claims damages for injuries suffered as an invitee upon Defendant’s premises as the result of a criminal assault."

Translation: a good samaritan came to assist a Tarbutt screwup security weenie who was having a problem arresting a shoplifter, and had called out for help from anyone, the helpful customer (Timothy Therrien) ended up knifed and as usual this screwed up company wouldn't compensate the man for his serious injuries.

The moral of this story is: TARGET SUCKS. It was a lot of work for Therrien for a rather low award, but it is nice to finally see that he was the winner in this. You might be interested in knowing that the Target AP Directives were used against Target (I sent them a copy) and also a lot of other AP information was obtained and entered in the case including the newer version of the Directives.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Today in History:


Thursday, February 26, 2009


Come in and

look around.



You might find

something here

you like!

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Rating Target Corporation:



In trolling the web I found a site called: Job Vent, I was interested in the Company Reviews for Target Corporation, although you can look up other firms as well.

Here is one comment from the site:


Brandon, FL 06/26/2008:

....All LODs are both lazy and incompetent. You never see them out on the sales floor actually doing their jobs. The amount of theft is thru the roof 'cause security is rarely on duty or just too relaxed about it.

Here is the site, you can pull it up FYI:
http://www.jobvent.com/companyBrowse.php?CompanyID=2081

As to Target quality quality of employment rated by -5 to +5:
Company Summary (Averages of 11 reviews)

Pay -0.36
Work/Life Balance -1
Respect -2.55
Career Potential/Growth -1.91
Benefits -0.91
Location 1.18
Job Security -1.82
Co-worker Competence -1.82
Work Environment -1.36
---------------------------
Total -10.55

Positive Reviews 2 / Negative Reviews 9



Add Your Feedback About Target Corporation at:
http://www.jobvent.com/rate.php?ID=2081


Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Yes, this is a Target Sucks blog site -


but just now and then something else really really stupid goes on and I have to give it a plug.

In the 'teaser' below we have one of those annoying wally World 'greeters' who got knocked on his ass by a pissed off cop, so just why am I bothering with this?

Well, we all would like to knock one of these morons on their butts but if we did it we would get a trip to the Grey Bar Hilton, this cop is just getting sued, but if these greeters are so annoying that even cops hate them and that should tell you something.

FYI: You don't have to show these clowns your receipt, I seldom do, I just smile and keep walking, so here goes:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Wal-Mart Greeter Suing Cop

February 2, 2009 - 9:23 PM By Kim Chapman

"Seventy-one year old Bill Walker says he's suing an off-duty Chattanooga police officer and the Chattanoog Police Department for 21 million dollars in a federal damage lawsuit.

Walker, a greeter at the Collegedale Wal-Mart, says he was shoved to the ground, and knocked unconscious by officer Kenneth Freeman. This happened Christmas Eve. Walker says as Freeman was leaving the store, he asked to see the officer's receipt. . ."

Click on this link to read more:
http://www.newschannel9.com/news/walker_975343___article.html/police_suing.html


Monday, February 2, 2009


Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Bloggers' Rights at EFF